I suggest we ...

Add empty value into the String module

Copied from this GitHub issue: https://github.com/Microsoft/visualfsharp/issues/1139

Right now, if I do not want to use the empty string literal "", I have to do something like

printfn "%s" System.String.Empty

in order to reference the public static readonly instance of the empty string in the BCL.

It would be more convenient if I can just do:

// Referencing the F# String module here instead of System.String
printfn "%s" String.empty

I would imagine String.empty to be an alias to System.String.Empty so there should be just a one-line code change:

module String =

let empty = ""

// Other String functions
I think this will be useful because we already have similar empty values from other modules such as Seq, List, and Array.

This will also make the code more explicit (i.e. convey to others that 'I want an empty string here' instead of 'this can potentially be a typo').

1 vote
Sign in
Sign in with: facebook google
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
Rex Ng shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

1 comment

Sign in
Sign in with: facebook google
Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Reed Adams commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    While you're waiting for an official library solution, it might be worth noting that you can extend and approximate the desired functionality in your own code for the time being, possibly giving you the expressiveness you're after.

    Example at: https://dotnetfiddle.net/rFSPQl

    Hopefully this gets you closer to where you want to be until a library solution is in place.

F# Language

Feedback and Knowledge Base